tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post4305115236627819048..comments2023-06-10T08:56:21.354-07:00Comments on Palin's Deceptions: Late Night UpdateAudreyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00205515802929831178noreply@blogger.comBlogger87125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-75822162290339511822008-12-25T15:14:00.000-08:002008-12-25T15:14:00.000-08:00Thank you everyone for your kind words and for let...Thank you everyone for your kind words and for letting me know about tinyurl.com. What a great site. I will use it from now on. Also when you link into the site...make sure you go into the SETS. They break the pictures into groups and show them in sequence by dates...making it easier to follow the sequence of photos. There is a set for Sara pre and post pregnant...one for just Bristol... and one set of Trigs photos. <BR/><BR/>http://tinyurl.com/9zsze9<BR/><BR/>I think it is amazing what we have uncovered so far. I personally believe Trig had an earlier delivery date then we were told. Sarah was just buying time with her fake pregnancy to pull together a birth time and date that she thought they could pull off. <BR/><BR/>Since Trig was born supposedly a month early... with downs syndrome... he would be a special needs baby. He would need monitoring and tests that would need time to be taken and then be reviewed. He NEVER would have been released so quickly from the hospital. Nor could I imagine any doctor who would recommend Trig...a premie with downs syndrome... be in contact with other people so soon after his birth. I think Trig is presented to the media on April 18th but that is not his real delivery date/birthdate....and the reason there is no record of his birth!<BR/><BR/>I don't think Sarah realized the scrutiny that she would receive on her pre-delivery story. Hey...I think it all made sense in her head. But as outsiders looking in... it is clearly a story that is not believeable... to say the least. It's Christmas...and I am trying to be kind. Even Santa knows she is not telling the truth...he whispered it in my ear just last night. :) <BR/><BR/>What is really sad to me is that she's not even aware of how irresponsible she is towards her family and children. She is clueless to her own ambition and ego and it's horrific effect it has had on her family. Her family is falling apart and she is still searching for the cameras to wink and smile at...and stroke her ego. My Christmas wish for Sarah and her family? Sarah: Put your family first...stop using and manipulating others for your own benefit...acknowledge the truth about yourself...and stop telling lies to cover your trail.<BR/> <BR/>Happy Holiday's to my fellow truthseekers. It is a pleasure to seek the truth with you!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-49930478978607397032008-12-25T08:33:00.000-08:002008-12-25T08:33:00.000-08:00Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays, everybody!...espec...Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays, everybody!<BR/><BR/>...especially Audrey, and Morgan and other mods, for their stamina in maintaining this blog, and their ability to stay focussed and on track.KaJohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11043005602676549904noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-83169246705878856272008-12-24T21:24:00.000-08:002008-12-24T21:24:00.000-08:00KaJo at 5:11 pm on Dec.23 mentioned Rose Rosetree'...KaJo at 5:11 pm on Dec.23 mentioned Rose Rosetree's blog and her article on Palin. http://tinyurl.com/94btfs<BR/>I've read most of Rose's books and have personally experienced her ability to read people. Rose is extremely accurate. -L.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-3736319565458764942008-12-24T19:52:00.000-08:002008-12-24T19:52:00.000-08:00To anon December 24, 2008 7:06 AM :With the 'offic...To anon December 24, 2008 7:06 AM :<BR/><BR/>With the 'official' birth announcement, I mean the one posted here earlier, and posted on Dianas flicker account (http://www.flickr.com/photos/33163903@N05/3094176700/in/set-72157610861585203/_Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-59922720577168661402008-12-24T19:42:00.000-08:002008-12-24T19:42:00.000-08:00To: palin pregnancy truthI'm sorry that I misunder...To: palin pregnancy truth<BR/><BR/>I'm sorry that I misunderstood your intent. I read the comment you referenced and it sounded like you were in the camp that has the mistaken belief that "natural born" is defined in the Constitution rather then Congress. I agree that it is all a distraction and prefer to focus on this site's, topic which is Palin and her weird pregnancy. Now I return to my regularly scheduled activity of wrapping x-mas presents:)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-14198679908807537482008-12-24T13:08:00.000-08:002008-12-24T13:08:00.000-08:00To Fran, I wasn't quoting the constitution, I was ...To Fran, I wasn't quoting the constitution, I was trying to sum up the argument about the anti-Obama birth certificate people. That's why only "natural born citizen" was in quotes. It has been interpreted to mean born on American soil by many people and that is where the lawsuits come in that I quote from wikipedia about Obama not being eligible. They also say that McCain would be ineligible by this interpretation.<BR/><BR/>My whole argument was that the Obama birth certificate issue is pointless and we ignore the trolls who bring it up. The point of this site is to find the truth about Palin's fifth child.<BR/><BR/>Mentioning Obama's birth certificate (just like saying that Bristol is 5 months pregnant) is a smoke screen that hides the real issue: that Palin's pregnancy story does not add up and she has yet to address it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-5052067015431408132008-12-24T11:16:00.000-08:002008-12-24T11:16:00.000-08:00Regarding "palin pregnancy truth saying that "the ...Regarding "palin pregnancy truth saying that "the constitution states that you have to be a "natural born citizen" born on American soil, not just to American parents. Being born to American's is good enough to be a US citizen, but not enough to qualify for president"<BR/><BR/>No! No! No! It says no such thing. It does not mention the words "born on American soil" I am so sick of people making up things that are so easily verifible. <BR/><BR/>Under Article. II. - The Executive Branch -Section 1 - The President<BR/><BR/>"No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."<BR/><BR/>http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html<BR/><BR/>Note that "natural born" is no defined and it has been left up to the Legislature to decide what it means. After all, does anyone seriously believe that a child born to American parents in the military stationed in a foreign country should be considered less of a natural born citizen then a child born to a Mexican women who manages to stumble into the US minutes before giving birth to her baby? <BR/><BR/>The irony of all of this is that thanks to the clumsy way a law was written back in 1937 to fix an unintended situation, McCain is not technically a "natural born" citizen but a "naturalized" citizen. McCain was born in the Panama Canal zone in 1935. The US law at that time stated that you were stilla "natural born" citizen if you had a parent that was a citizen and you were born in a nation outside us juridiction. That meant that babies born to citizens in place like Panama fell into a greyzone because they were within US jurisdiction, but not US soil. Ooops. So in 1937 the law was changed and all babys born in Panal were now "natural born" citizens but they forgot to grandfather in all of the already born babys who been born between it came under US jurisdiction and the law taking effect so those baby's became "naturalized citizens". Ooops. McCain is technically a "naturalized Citizen", although I think it was certainly not the intent of law and would never advocate that he not be allowed to President because of it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-34130369565080294652008-12-24T08:41:00.000-08:002008-12-24T08:41:00.000-08:00The "two baby theory" has a nice ring to...The "two baby theory" has a nice ring to it! Perhaps the phrase, "stand-in baby" is more acceptable. I still think my "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels" theory has merit: Sarah faked "her" pregnancy in order to adopt a readily available DS child in order to cover up an abortion that Bristol had. She had to explain Bristol's well-know about-town pregnancy and the fact that she did not have a baby. If Bristol had an abortion, that is the only event that Sarah could not and still cannot tell the truth about and still be president. (Bush's girlfriend was rumored to have had an abortion arranged by Poppy's henchmen, but that was kept under lock & key and likely serious threats,) Having the whole world think she faked her pregnancy to adopt Bristol's child is clearly a more acceptable scenario for Sarah's career. While this theory may not be true, it explains everything far better than any other theory. The exception may be why Bristol appears to have better maternal instincts than Sarah when she is with Trig. Perhaps, maternal instinct is Sarah's Achilles' heel.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-43770467863744879122008-12-24T08:15:00.000-08:002008-12-24T08:15:00.000-08:00To Notalib"I was so disappointed that the photosho...To Notalib<BR/><BR/>"I was so disappointed that the photoshop expert report was not posted on Dec 22 as promised."<BR/><BR/>I was soooooo disappointed that Bristol did not have her baby on the 18th or the 20th December as promised but realise in life that not everything can go to plan.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-62077402814838750842008-12-24T07:46:00.000-08:002008-12-24T07:46:00.000-08:00From Anon 7:45 Kajo, I was not trying to get off ...From Anon 7:45 <BR/><BR/>Kajo, I was not trying to get off track. (no pun intended) I wanted to dispel that counter argument since notalib brought it up. I have always believed in the validity of Obama being born in Hawaii. Also I appreciate the Palin Pregnancy revealed comment about wikipedia. I looked it up and on that page it mentions that McCain was born overseas (in Panama) so it's really silly that anyone even brought up the Obama birth. However, although I LOVE wiki, please remember that it is a community effort and information does rely upon people's individual knowledge which is collectively decided as fact. The information has been off at times and needed editing. One used to be able to not just only add to a page but to delete a whole Wiki page and put up anything--now it is a more controlled process. Intentional incorrect information was a concern but the founder believed that people be more likely to be protective of something that they build themselves rather than intentionally destructive. This has held true. Wiki is a great source but not gospel--much like everything. <BR/><BR/>Also Kajo, having gone through immigration and several other government systems for various reasons, I have 5 "Original" birth certificates in my possession. If you write to your courthouse they will issue as many "originals" as you need--all official copies are considered government "originals" Pretty silly, huh? I'll never forget a line in the immigration paperwork to get a fiancee visa. It said "send this form with a copy of you original birth certificate, but since it is illegal to copy official government documents just send the original and it will be returned to you"<BR/><BR/>I have been a long time supporter of this whole suspect pregnancy. I believed it since she first announced Bristol's pregnancy--even when there was not a lot of info and this sight was new. I'm really on your side. I also volunteered as an office manager for Obama's campaign in NH the day after Palin gave her speech. <BR/><BR/>As a mother, I feel so sad for Bristol. She has been betrayed on such a heartbreaking level. Palin treats her children as possessions and accessories. It's obvious that she has virtually no decent support system in her life. It's not her fault that he mother is such an self-centered person.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-78789329639393127822008-12-24T07:06:00.000-08:002008-12-24T07:06:00.000-08:00To Anon, 12/23 @ 8:58PMDo you have a link to the p...To Anon, 12/23 @ 8:58PM<BR/>Do you have a link to the photo of Trig used in the "official" birth announcement? I'd like to compare the baby pics that you've mentioned - thanks! (Something has always seemed odd about them to me too, but now I can't relocate them to do a side-by-side comparison...)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-31604395760953063812008-12-24T06:42:00.000-08:002008-12-24T06:42:00.000-08:00Ok I said I was not going to post but that post by...Ok I said I was not going to post but that post by kajo is just too out there not to say something. TWO BABIES? Are you for real? Is that like the second shooter theory on the grassy knoll? <BR/><BR/>There has got to be someone in the hospital that has the same dislike for Sarah as all of you, why have they not come forward with the "truth"?<BR/><BR/>But to come out with this theory is just too bizarre.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-21772253933805239472008-12-23T23:17:00.000-08:002008-12-23T23:17:00.000-08:00To: Mary G.You asked if I had more information ab...To: Mary G.<BR/><BR/>You asked if I had more information about the adoption agency tied in with Dr. Catherine Baldwin Johnson, Sarah's doctor.<BR/><BR/>First, you must know this doctor is well known for her work with abused children. <BR/><BR/>In the Alaskan Daily News, I read an article about a woman who had her child taken away from her by this doctor on what the woman claimed was "trumped-up-charges".<BR/><BR/>Her child was placed up for adoption thru this doctor and her church. It has taken this woman years to take the case to court and get her child back.<BR/><BR/>The ADN article was very brief and gave no details. Apparently, the woman won the case.<BR/><BR/>Anyway, this was my source of information. It really doesn't have anything to do with our blog but if you wish to pursue this story, I suggest you contact the ADN.Gingerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11214686482814006138noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-89157233742781181712008-12-23T23:02:00.000-08:002008-12-23T23:02:00.000-08:00They said on 9/1 that Bristol was "five months." O...<I>They said on 9/1 that Bristol was "five months." </I><BR/><BR/>Oops! Our bad! We meant "five weeks!" <BR/><BR/>Seriously, they're all playing this thing by ear, no rhyme or reason to their stories except what benefits them in the immediate moment.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-46526686752818405602008-12-23T22:29:00.000-08:002008-12-23T22:29:00.000-08:00"I feel bad for her. She's such a pretty girl and ..."I feel bad for her. She's such a pretty girl and she should be living the best years of her life."<BR/><BR/>The scary thing is, these may very well be the best years of her life. Nothing in that family's history leads me to believe that she has been raised to do anything but party and do drugs. I suspect that for her, it's all gonna be downhill from here on.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-58478420870459028122008-12-23T21:41:00.000-08:002008-12-23T21:41:00.000-08:00OK ladies I will just leave you all alone to your ...OK ladies I will just leave you all alone to your little investigation. I will no longer question your motives or try to challenge your agenda. I will still pop in to see if you ever accomplish what you are trying to, but somehow I am not holding out much hope. <BR/><BR/>Good Luck ladies have fun and Merry Christmas to all of you and may God bless you all.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-53213300002408215622008-12-23T20:58:00.000-08:002008-12-23T20:58:00.000-08:00Kajo at December 23, 2008 8:33 PM Maybe there is ...Kajo at December 23, 2008 8:33 PM Maybe there is something to your 'convoluted story'... Check out the 'official' birthannouncement. Something about that picture has bothered me ever since I first saw it: The baby looks NOTHING like Trig in the 'supposedly' day-after-birth pics with his grandparents, nor in any of the pics with SP right afterwards!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-62935336667429440362008-12-23T20:41:00.000-08:002008-12-23T20:41:00.000-08:00Actually if you look at a pregnancy calculator ......Actually if you look at a pregnancy calculator ... there are a lot of them available on the Internet... we can rule out Bristol as Trig's mother if she gives birth to a full term baby any time before early February. This is of course assuming he was really born on April 18. <BR/><BR/>Here's why. The earliest a woman can get pregnant after giving birth is about 35 days. This would mean Bristol couldn't get pregnant before around the 23rd or so of May which gives a due date of mid Feb. However, of course, if the baby would be very small then he might be premature and all bets are off.<BR/><BR/>But the biggie is not so much as if or when Bristol has the baby. It's more than if the McCain campaign and Sarah Palin lied. They said on 9/1 that Bristol was "five months." If you take this to mean 22-24 weeks, this does give a due date of around December 20. <BR/><BR/>If it goes much beyond the first of the year, it will be obvious that the McCain campaign lied on September 1. so even though there would be a larger window that would rule out Bristol as Trig's mom, they'd still be left explaining why they lied.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-71319349367981545332008-12-23T20:34:00.000-08:002008-12-23T20:34:00.000-08:00To anonymous 7:45: the constitution states that yo...To anonymous 7:45: the constitution states that you have to be a "natural born citizen" born on American soil, not just to American parents. Being born to American's is good enough to be a US citizen, but not enough to qualify for president.<BR/><BR/>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born_citizen<BR/><BR/>There has been doubt about the authenticity of Obama's birth certificate and whether he was actually born in Hawaii (vs. Kenya).<BR/><BR/>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories<BR/><BR/>However, Barack Obama released his birth certificate and got Hawaii’s Department of Health to state it was on file. Factcheck.org verified it (however they also "verified" the Gusty pics). You certainly have a right to assert that the birth certificate was faked, but Obama has provided a HECK of a lot more credible evidence for his birth in Hawaii than Palin has for her birth of Trig.<BR/><BR/>Obama's birth certificate issue is not for this site. To the people who continue to bring it up: At least Obama provided a birth certificate and had an independent party verify its authenticity. Why hasn't Palin done the same?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-31020092224142999452008-12-23T20:33:00.000-08:002008-12-23T20:33:00.000-08:00And now -- ta DA! -- my new Trig Palin theory.I've...And now -- ta DA! -- my new Trig Palin theory.<BR/><BR/>I've been thinking about Trig Palin's appearance in the soon-after-birth pictures, and the ones that patently show him to be suffering from DS.<BR/><BR/>My answer to that question might also be the answer sought to explain why Bristol Palin was out of circulation for a period of time, why Sarah Palin hastily traveled back from Dallas, why the subterfuge between March and April-that-was-supposed-to-be-May.<BR/><BR/>My supposition: They used two babies.<BR/><BR/>One was a normal slightly pre-term infant several days old that is seen in the newborn pictures. <BR/><BR/>Meanwhile, Trig was sequestered since his birth, which likely occurred a month before. His perinatal exams and treatment were ongoing. <BR/><BR/>That's probably why Sarah Palin thought she had lots of time to go on the speaking trip to Dallas; they knew a pregnant mommy would have the "backup baby" ready to go at the expected time/date.<BR/><BR/>But something went wrong, and Sarah had to hurry back from Dallas with the ill-conceived subterfuge. What caused that haste? The mother of the normal newborn infant giving birth ahead of time?<BR/><BR/>That would explain several things:<BR/> <BR/>1) How Bristol was able to get pregnant a second time; she probably actually had a menses between Trig's birth and conception of the infant she's due to deliver any day now.<BR/><BR/>2) Why Trig Palin's name didn't appear on the published list of births for the Mat-Su hospital. He probably wasn't on the list anyway, but how about looking for another baby boy born April 16-17, 2008?<BR/> <BR/>3) Willow seeing the several-weeks-old Trig and the normal newborn at the same time, and remarking on Trig's DS. Isn't it true Willow's remark wasn't recorded at the time; we only have Palin's word for the statement (see People mag. story)?<BR/><BR/>4) Trig Palin being on baby food at (supposedly) 3-1/2 months August 1, 2008 (picture of SP and Piper, baby food on desk).<BR/><BR/>5) Trig Palin being a rather LARGE baby at (supposedly) 4-1/2 months in the pix of him at the RNC.<BR/><BR/>6) Who would be party to such a ruse? My guess is that one of Sarah Palin's dearest friends would be willing to serve as surrogate mom in this manner, loaning her newborn infant out for a few days.<BR/><BR/>They'd need the loan of the normal newborn infant for publicity pictures only until the Palin baby shower; after that the older, larger Trig was sequestered in the baby sling, wrapped up in a blanket, etc. etc.<BR/><BR/>If a copy of Trig's birth certificate was ever obtained, I'll bet it shows a birth date of March 15th or so.<BR/><BR/>Pretty convoluted, eh? But hey, I think this theory has legs. :)KaJohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11043005602676549904noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-10635083748351913662008-12-23T20:23:00.001-08:002008-12-23T20:23:00.001-08:00Windy City Woman,I'm sure LOTS of people are g...Windy City Woman,<BR/>I'm sure LOTS of people are going to post this, but the people in the photo you are referring to are (from Left) Track, Piper, Willow, Bristol & Trig. Her family.........<BR/><BR/>Poor Bristol doesn't get a chance to hang out with her friends. She will never get to experience a regular 18 year old's existence. <BR/><BR/>I feel bad for her. She's such a pretty girl and she should be living the best years of her life.<BR/><BR/>I do wish her well.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-240584838985182192008-12-23T20:23:00.000-08:002008-12-23T20:23:00.000-08:00It is a sidetrack from the substance of this websi...It is a sidetrack from the substance of this website; but the question re Obama's birth certificate has already been addressed satisfactorily to all except those who refuse to accept reality. I think the question stems (in part) from the requirement that the Constitution specifies that the President and VP must be not just "citizens" but "natural born citizens."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-77046066468995988432008-12-23T20:20:00.000-08:002008-12-23T20:20:00.000-08:00I was going to post my new theory about Trig Palin...I was going to post my new theory about Trig Palin, but I just saw the post from Anonymous @ 7:45 PM.<BR/><BR/>Arrrgh. I'm not aiming this at you, Anon@7:45 PM. It's just that the question shouldn't even come up.<BR/><BR/>There is no question as to the authenticity of the COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE for Obama. It's just another tinfoil conspiracy theory by neocon nitwits.<BR/><BR/>They keep "hammering" away about the "original birth certificate", as if each and every one of THEM has their ORIGINAL in hand, so "why doesn't Barack Obama publish HIS original birth certificate?"<BR/><BR/>Those obsessed fanatics have COPIES of their birth certificates. We all do. ORIGINAL birth certificates aren't released to anybody. They can be examined by the proper authorities (or like the person whose name is ON the birth certificate, or a legal rep), but they aren't released.<BR/><BR/>Question for all the conspiracy theorists on this matter: Suppose you lived through Hurricane Katrina, and all your legal papers including your birth certificate COPY were destroyed. If it were the ORIGINAL, you'd never get it back. It'd be gone forever. The Social Security Administration might not send you checks when you reach SS age without that document (just kidding -- sort of). But you're saved! That was a COPY you lost, and the ORIGINAL is safely in a fireproof, waterproof, floodproof vault along with millions of others, and all you have to do is ask for another copy.<BR/><BR/>And chances are, it'll be printed up just like Barack Obama's COPY of HIS birth certificate, on a form designed in 1995 or whatever, and printed via a state-of-the-art laser printer.<BR/><BR/>I'm senior citizen age, and I have a COPY of my birth certificate. But my mom obtained it in the early '50s before we moved from the state of my birth. It has an official seal stamped on it, and it's in the form of a negative...as if someone took a 35mm picture of my ORIGINAL birth certificate, and printed up the copy from the negative.KaJohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11043005602676549904noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-13206077288451777842008-12-23T19:45:00.000-08:002008-12-23T19:45:00.000-08:00Just as an aside, especially regarding comments fr...Just as an aside, especially regarding comments from notalib and Morgan, there is no legal reality to the Obama birth certificate. Any child of an American citizen is automatically an American REGARDLESS of where the birth actually took place....just ask anyone who works overseas or the military. An child born to an American in say Germany, would have legal automatic American citizenship and also qualify for German citizenship by birthplace. Obama could have been born on Mars and would still have be a native born American due to parentage unless he legally renounced it at 18. How do I know? I am American, my husband is French, our kids have duel citizenship until they make a choice at 18 regardless of where they were born.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091845104881454109.post-29767932230535130302008-12-23T19:44:00.000-08:002008-12-23T19:44:00.000-08:00Folks,Some of you have asked where the photo is of...Folks,<BR/>Some of you have asked where the photo is of Bristol with Trig and her teenage friends.<BR/><BR/>Go to Diana's link. At the bottom of the page you see that this site has several pages. Go to page 2. The photo I'm talking about is on the far right of the second row and is labelled "family1."<BR/><BR/>All: Trig is a little cutie, isn't he?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com